7 Anti-Gay Hate Crimes in 11 Days
Posted by Matt in DADT, ENDA, Hate Crimes, News on July 2nd, 2009
This is getting ridiculous. Seven. That I know of. SEVEN. Let’s go through these all-too-common anti-gay hate crimes in chronological order.

Leslie Mora
Tapia and Ortiz fled when a passerby threatened to call the police, but were apprehended and charged with assault with intent to cause physical injury with a weapon, a felony, and released on their own recognizance. Leslie was treated for her injuries at a local Queens hospital.
From the New York Blade:
The Queens County District Attorney has declined to investigate the attack as a hate crime because current law does not provide protection for gender identity, according to TLDEF. Michael Silverman, the group’s executive director, said in a statement, “While Leslie is a transgender woman, her attackers perceived her to be gay. State law currently classifies it as a hate crime for an individual to target and attack a victim because of the victim’s actual or perceived sexual orientation. Leslie’s assault is a hate crime because her attackers perceived her to be gay and targeted her for violence because of that perception. This is as clear a case for prosecution as a hate crime as any we have seen.”

William Crilly and his little wagon
The following day in Nebraska, Human Rights Campaign volunteer Kendra Konrady was marching in Omaha’s gay pride parade when she saw a man with a small rainbow covered wagon. She later found out that his sign said “For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ Our Lord.” From The Pitch:
Konrady admits she has little tolerance for religious zealots with a penchant for overstepping their territory. “All of a sudden I hear, ‘The Lord hadeth this, that and the other business,’ ” she says. “But I’m thinking, Kill them with kindness.”
So she threw a few HRC stickers into their wagon — the adhesive still covered. She heard someone say, “You better not do that.” Then one of the Bible-quoting men grabbed her from behind. “He had me in a head lock and I was kind of flailing,” she says. “I’m a pacifist through and through, but this dude just attacked me.”
The crowd quickly responded and the man backed off. Konrady marched up to the next police officer she could find and told him what happened. Two other witnesses confirmed that the man pushed Konrady away from the wagon and put her in a headlock.
The man was William Crilly, a 66-year-old Omaha resident. According to the police report, “The suspect, who stated he was just trying to get them away, was arrested for assault.”

Jason Saunders
One person has been arrested, but police are still looking for information on the other four. Meanwhile, Jason is still feeling the psychological effects of the attack. According to the Bridgwater Mercury:
He said: “I can’t physically move because I am in so much pain. I’m scared to leave the house and can’t do anything by myself – I can’t even go upstairs in my own home alone.”
His boyfriend, 22-year-old Gary Holman, added: “I tried to get him out of the house on Wednesday, just 100 yards up the road to a friend’s house, but he was scared when someone shut their front door. Then he puked.
“Before, he was a funny, caring and happy man. Now he is a nervous wreck, frightened to go out and can’t be by himself. It has changed him so much.”

Joe Holladay
“It’s very blurry,” he says, “But yeah, they said ‘faggot.’ And the next thing I know I’m in the hospital.”
Jerome, an acting coach, heard the fracas and came downstairs to find his friend “in a pool of blood. I thought he was dead. He wasn’t moving.” Jerome says neighbors in the building told him, and the police, that they saw a group of five or six young white men “with crewcuts, wearing wife-beaters” smoking pot outside the building just before the incident — and, drawn to their window by the noise when the beating occurred, heard the anti-gay epithets and saw the young men pile into a car and drive away.
“They even identified the make and model,” says Holladay. “A gold Subaru older model station wagon. They clearly saw what happened.” Holladay says [the ER doctor] told him his injuries suggest he was hit with a blunt object. “The mark on my forehead looks like it was made by the base of a gun,” he says.
Despite the detailed description of the witnesses (It was later reported that one of them was shouting “Hey faggot what are you looking at” before hitting him with the butt of a gun.), Joe’s attackers have not yet been arrested. He remains in New York for the time being.
The next morning, just blocks away, another gay man was attacked. Michael Doane was walking his dog on East 84th Street around 3:20 on Sunday morning when a couple of guys jumped him, fractured his skull and broke his nose. The New York Post has more on the story:
In the Sunday attack, a Good Samaritan was walking his dog around 3:30 a.m. when he spotted him, covered in blood and lying motionless on the pavement in front of 313 East 84th Street as two white men laced into him.
The man who came to his aid said, “He was on the ground and they were kicking him in the head over and over. “I said, ‘what the f—- are you doing? Are you crazy get out of here. His [the victim's] face was full of blood I couldn’t tell where it was coming from there was so much,” he said. The two men, who may have had accomplices, ran away.
“He was on the sidewalk and it looked like he was going to go to sleep all curled up. I called the ambulance and he freaked out,” said the witness who had called 911 for an ambulance.
“He was disoriented and didn’t know what was going on. He has as no recollection of what happened. If you see his face you want to break down and cry. He looks like Frankenstein. They broke his head in two places and had to reconstruct his skull.”
Meanwhile, of course, a gay bar in Fort Worth, Texas was being raided. I put this in the ‘hate crime’ category because frankly, it was obviously a hate crime. Since yesterday’s post, we’ve learned that the still-hospitalized victim was indeed drunk, with a blood alcohol level of 0.2, over twice the legal limit for drunk driving. However, a) he was in a bar, b) the same information tells us that Chad Gibson was nowhere near the benchmark of alcohol poisoning (0.4), which Fort Worth Police Chief Jeff Halstead has claimed as the reason for his massive injuries, and c) HE WAS IN A BAR.
Jim Burroway of Box Turtle Bulletin explains at length why the only reasonable explanation for his injuries is from the brutality that was witnessed and photographed by patrons and employees of the Rainbow Lounge.

August Provost III
1980 - 2009
The final hate crime victim (that I know of) in the last 11 days is the most painful. In the early hours of June 30th, the body of Seaman August Provost was found at Camp Pendleton in California. San Diego’s NBC affiliate has details:
Spokesmen for the Navy and Marine Corps confirmed that a sailor’s body was found on the base at about 3 a.m. Tuesday morning. The victim is Seaman August Prevos, 29, a native of Houston, according to the Naval Criminal Investigative Service. A spokesman confirmed that there was evidence of foul play in the killing and that the case is a murder investigation.
The NCIS spokesman also said that a “person of interest” is now in custody at Camp Pendleton but has not been charged with a crime.
City Human Rights Commissioner Nicole Murray urged an audience at a gay-rights rally (at Liberty Station held Wednesday to celebrate Pride Month in San Diego) to demand answers now to a mysterious homicide at Camp Pendleton. Murray and another gay activist said they have credible information that the killing was a hate crime and that the victim was targeted because he was gay, or perceived to be gay.
The activists said their sources told them that the sailor worked as a guard for Assault Craft Unit 5 at Camp Pendleton. That unit operates the military hovercrafts stationed at Pendleton. The sources also said the victim was shot and burned.
The San Diego Union-Tribune has more, including words from August’s boyfriend:
Provost’s boyfriend, Kaether Cordero, said yesterday that Provost was openly gay but kept his private life quiet for the most part. People who he was friends with, I knew that they knew,” Cordero said from Houston. “He didn’t care that they knew. He trusted them.”
Provost had recently complained to his family that someone was harassing and bothering him, and they advised him to tell his supervisor, said his sister, Akalia. “He’s the type that if someone comes at him, he walks away. He never stands and argues,” she said. “He didn’t deserve anything but a good life.”
Family described Provost as a well-mannered, humble and goofy guy who strived to make sure his mother was well-taken care of. Provost was assigned to Assault Craft Unit 5 on the base.
It’s been 40 years since Stonewall. I don’t want to discount the massive progress we’ve made, but we have so much further to go until we can even feel safe in our own homes and neighborhoods.
Categories: DADT + ENDA + Hate Crimes + News
Police Chief Uses Gay Panic Defense for Bar Raid Brutality
Posted by Matt in Hate Crimes, News on July 1st, 2009
It’s been four days since Texas law enforcement raided Fort Worth’s Rainbow Lounge and started picking random gay men to arrest and abuse, supposedly for public intoxication. (For the story cobbled together from eight witnesses, start here.) Since then the story has taken several twists and turns, some straight out of the homophobe handbook.
I spent way too much time clipping witness accounts from Dallas/Ft. Worth news sources, but instead of giving you a 2,000 post to slog through, how about we get to the nitty gritty? If you’re so inclined, check out this link, and this one, and another.
First, a video report from a local news station, including a brief statement from Kelly Carter, mother Chad Gibson, who is still hospitalized with bleeding on the brain from injuries sustained in Sunday’s raid.
The person who hits this nail square on the head is Dan Savage, who provides all the commentary necessary.
The officers who raided the Rainbow Lounge claim that the men in the bar made “advances” on them—and Forth Worth’s police chief is backing them up:
Monday, police chief Jeff Halstead said the officers’ actions are being investigated. However, he also said that officers that entered the bar during the scheduled inspection were touched inappropriately.
“You’re touched and advanced in certain ways by people inside the bar, that’s offensive,” he said. “I’m happy with the restraint used when they were contacted like that.”
Allow me to translate the chief’s comments: “Them faggots in that thar bar touched mah officers and now they’re complainin’ about some rough stuff and one little ol’ faggot with a brain injury? Those perverts should be grateful they’re alive.”
This is a classic example of the Gay Panic Defense. In the very recent past all a straight man who brutally murdered a gay man had to say was, “He made a pass at me!”, and the jury would ignore the evidence and let the murderer off. The Gay Panic Defense doesn’t fly in many courts of law these days but it still has currency in the court of public opinion. And the chief of police in Forth Worth, a major U.S. city, is attempting to use the Gay Panic Defense to convince the citizens of Fort Worth to ignore the evidence—to ignore photographic evidence and credible eyewitness accounts—and let his officers off.
… The police claim that Gibson wasn’t injured when those four or five cops slammed him to the floor of the bar, but after his arrest, when, drunk and handcuffed, Gibson somehow fell and hit his head on the pavement outside the bar.
All of this is bullshit.
I’m getting uncomfortable with the amount of Dan’s post I pasted, so I’ll stop there. Click through to read more.
Chief Halstead’s Gay Panic ploy is offensive. Obviously so. I’ve never been in a bar (let alone a gay one) in my life and even I can tell you he’s full of shit.
Meanwhile, Chad Gibson remains hospitalized, upgraded this afternoon to stable condition. A fund has been set up to help pay for his medical bills. Donations can be made at any Frost Bank location in Texas. Ask to make a donation to Q Cinema for the benefit of Chad Gibson (the donation is through Q Cinema in order to be tax deductible). The account number is 608439230. Ability to make online donations coming soon.
Categories: Hate Crimes + News
Obama Administration Accepts Transgender Discrimination Ruling
I’ve been fairly vocal in my disappointment with President Obama over the last several months, but I think we need to be just as vocal when he helps achieve a victory. One of those victories came this morning, as the deadline passed for the Obama Administration to appeal the ruling of Diane Schroer’s discrimination case against the Library of Congress. From the ACLU:
WASHINGTON, DC – The U.S. Department of Justice decided not to appeal a federal court ruling awarding transgender veteran Diane Schroer the maximum compensation for the discrimination she suffered after being refused a job with the Library of Congress. The deadline for seeking an appeal was June 30. The American Civil Liberties Union has represented Schroer in her case.
The Obama administration’s decision whether to appeal the final ruling in the case has been closely watched in part because the Bush administration defended the case so vigorously, arguing that transgender Americans are not protected by any existing federal laws. The decision not to appeal the verdict is consistent with the Obama administration’s campaign promises to protect transgender workers against discrimination and his administration’s recent order taking steps to bar gender identity discrimination in federal employment.
“I am grateful that the court took the time to examine the case in detail and come to a fair and unbiased decision. In that same light, I am gratified that the current administration saw this for what it was, a case of sex discrimination focused against transgender people, and recognized that it must end in this country,” said Schroer, an Army Special Forces veteran with 25 years service. “The important signal that the administration’s decision sends to all LGBT individuals gives me renewed hope and restores some of my shaken faith in what our country stands for.”
On April 29, 2009, a federal court awarded Schroer maximum damages of $491,190 for back pay, other financial losses and emotional pain and suffering after finding the Library illegally discriminated against Schroer because of her sex. At trial, Schroer testified that she had applied for a position with the Library of Congress as the senior terrorism research analyst and was offered the job. Prior to starting work, she took her future boss to lunch to explain that she was in the process of transitioning and wished to start work presenting as female. The following day, Schroer received a call from her future boss rescinding the offer, telling her that she wasn’t a “good fit” for the Library of Congress.
“This case put employers on notice that discrimination against transgender individuals is like any other form of discrimination – counterproductive and against our principles as a nation,” added Schroer. “But this case alone won’t end the rampant discrimination that transgender people face throughout the country. That’s why we need Congress to pass the Employment Non-Discrimination Act that was introduced last week.”
Congratulations to Ms. Schroer and to all in the transgender community. This victory is a blow to the prejudices and discrimination that so painfully harm the lives of our transgender sisters and brothers.
Below, Ms. Schroer shares her story in a video made two years ago when the Bush Administration was vigorously defending the discrimination she faced.
Olbermann and Gates talk DADT
As I said Monday, this is a busy couple days for Don’t Ask Don’t Tell. Following yesterday’s hearing and the recommendation that 1Lt. Dan Choi be fired for being gay, Dan Savage appeared on Countdown with Keith Olbermann to talk about the policy.
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
Earlier in the day, Defense Secretary Robert Gates spoke briefly about DADT.
SEC. GATES: There was some discussion of [Don't Ask Don't Tell] among the senior military during our Defense Senior Leadership Conference last week, and I think my last discussion with the president was probably last week as well.
Q And what was the level of that discussion? Was it just the same — his desire or is it –
SEC. GATES: We were talking about how do we move forward on this to achieve his objective which is changing the policy and the issue that we face is that how do we begin to do preparations and simultaneously the administration move forward in terms of asking the Congress to change the law.
What we have is a law — be it a policy or a regulation — and as I discovered when I got into it, it’s a very prescriptive law. It doesn’t leave much to the imagination for a lot of flexibility.
And so one of the things we’re looking at is is there flexibility in how we apply this law in terms of — well, let me give you an example. Do we need to be driven when the information, to take action on somebody if we get that information from somebody who may have vengeance in mind or blackmail or somebody who has been jilted.
Q Somebody was outed without –
(Cross talk.)
SEC. GATES: Yeah. In other words, if somebody is outed by a third party, we have to — does that force us to take an action? And I don’t know the answer to that and I don’t want to pretend to. But that’s the kind of thing we’re looking at to see if there’s at least a more humane way to apply the law until the law gets changed.
This is a far cry from the Secretary Gates we saw just three months ago who said that they had “a lot on their plates” and they were going to “push that one down the road”.
It’s important to understand what Gates is talking about with the third party outings. 2Lt. Amy Brian’s firing earlier this year is a prime example. A non-military coworker (Brian was a Reservist) had a problem with her and informed them that she saw Amy kiss her girlfriend in Wal-Mart. Maj. Margaret Witt’s and Lt. Col. Victor Fehrenbach’s cases were also begun by a non-military third party.
Is it a perfect solution? No. Is it as good as an executive order? No. But given that President Obama still resists signing an executive order, this is a reasonable transition measure.
US Government One Step Closer to Firing Lt. Dan Choi
Following a very long hearing, an army discharge board has recommended firing 1Lt. Dan Choi today in Syracuse, New York. The one and only reason for this decision is that Lt. Choi is gay.

At 2:50pm, while the board was still deliberating, Lt. Choi shared the following via KnightsOut.org:
Still awaiting their verdict… I’ve received support text messages from around the world, and most importantly the members of my unit. My statement talked about Army values of integrity and sending a message from Knights Out to all the deployed soldiers or anyone who feels isolated, that indeed NO soldier stands alone. (Outside the hearing room is a poster with that exact message.) I also said I am gay. I refused to lie, and told them I refuse to stay silent, particularly since the soldiers in my unit respect honesty above personal gain. I recited the Iraqi poem of historic fame and of course translated it myself. In Arabic English and transliterated English. I presented the total 260,000 support letters and signatures to include statements by generals, admirals, and congressmen. I refuse to go quietly, and explained this as my duty.
Some time later, the post was updated with this:
About three hours of deliberation and no verdict yet. Every witness on both sides said I was an asset to the unit and the only evidence were statements of homosexuality . My statement included Arabic poem, I am gay, refuse to lie, my duty to ensure the message to every gay soldier that they are not alone.
Tonight at 6:49PM, Knights Out chair Becky Kanis released an email to Knights Out members confirming that the recommendation is official. According to Syracuse.com, this is not quite a final decision:
The recommendation is not a final decision. Another recommendation will be made by the Commander of the First Army, a regional branch of the army. The chief of the National Guard Bureau has the final decision.
It should be noted that board recommendations are rarely overruled, and such an action is unprecedented in the case of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell.


