Sarah Palin Opens Her Mouth And Removes All Doubt


Remember back six weeks ago when I said that John McCain was looking for an anti-gay running mate? Well, he found one in Alaska Governor Sarah Palin a few days later. I’ve kept schtum here on the blog, but I decided that it was time to speak up after her interview with Katie Couric.

In the Couric interview, Governor Palin had this to say:

But you are talking about, I think, a value here, what my position is on homosexuality and can you pray it away ’cause I think that was the title that was listed in that bulletin. And, you know, I don’t know what prayers are worthy of being prayed. And I don’t know what prayers are gonna be answered or not answered. But as for homosexuality, I am not going to judge Americans and the decisions that they make in their adult personal relationships.

I have, one of my absolute best friends for the last 30 years who happens to be gay. And I love her dearly. And she is not my “gay friend.” She is one of my best friends who happens to have made a choice that isn’t a choice that I have made. But I am not gonna judge people. And I love America where we are more tolerant than other countries are. And are more accepting of some of these choices that sometimes people want to believe reflects solely on an individual’s values or not. Homosexuality, I am not gonna judge people.

Here, Palin is using the same coded language that many anti-gay people use. Her use of the word “choice” three times is indicative of an attitude that is based not on truth and reason, but on ignorance. She considers homosexuality to be a “choice” that one can decide to make rather than what it’s been proven to be: a natural state of being that a person doesn’t decide on.

And her claim that she “[doesn't] know what prayers are worthy of being prayed” sounds good on the surface, but when you dig just a little bit into what that means, you discover that she’s saying that maybe you can pray the gay away. Again, this is based on ignorance.

What Palin doesn’t say is as important as what she does say. She doesn’t say that the conversion therapy her church (whether she’s a member or not is pretty irrelevant) endorses and Mr. Dobson’s group provides is harmful. She doesn’t mention the physical, psychological, and spiritual violence that such therapies encourage. She doesn’t acknowledge the readily available statements of respected medical and mental health organizations against conversion therapies.

The “I even have a gay friend” thing is silly, so I won’t even go into it here except to mention that Dan Savage of Savage Love has started an application drive for the position of Sarah Palin’s Gay Friend. I haven’t put my application in yet, but I’m working on it.

Of course my opinions about what Sarah Palin really thinks about The Gays are all just supposition. After all, I hadn’t even heard of her until six weeks ago. So in the interest of fairness, I’ll close with what the Human Rights Campaign found LGBT folks from Alaska think about their Governor.

http://blog.mattalgren.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/Sarah-Palin-HRC.flv

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. A vote for John McCain and Sarah Palin is a vote for the restriction and reduction of basic civil rights. America can’t afford that anymore.

Related posts



If you enjoyed this post, please consider subscribing to the feed to get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

(Read the comment rules before joining the conversation.)

  • Agreed, 100%! The sort of "conversion" endorsed by so many religious groups such as Palin's is something that sickens me thoroughly.

    In the mid 80s when I was at LSU I had a friend who was an evangelical. Our friendship was formed because unlike my experience with most evangelicals he would actually engage in honest and thougthful conversation about the nature of belief without simply relying on regurgitation of christian talking points.

    We would hang out and alternate between talking about food, talking about our personal beliefs and playing guitar. Unlike many these days we could agree to disagree and still enjoy each other's company.

    Then he disappeared for about six weeks. No one heard from him at all. I even braved his church to go look for him. All for naught.

    At the end of the six weeks he showed up at my door at 3am, drunk. (he was normall a non drinker) With tears running down his face he told me that before he was saved he had been a horrible sinner, a homosexual.

    During the time he was missing he had been with a man. His eyes lit up as he spoke of this wonderful man and how he had fallen head over heels in love with him. Wile saying this his face fell and he was wracked with sobs because he felt that no matter how right this felt it was still a nigh unforgivable sin. I have never seen someone so torn between their feelings and their beliefs. My girlfriend and I tried to reassure him and lend support as best we could, sitting there talking with him till mid-afternoon the next day.

    Two days later he returned to his church group, wracked with guilt over both his perceived "sin" and for betraying his lover by walking out on him.

    Two days later he was dead by his own hand, unable to reconcile the narrow views of his church with the realities of his life and love.

    These are the kind of stories that we will see everywhere around us if Palin gets anywhere near the White House.
  • Loki » That kind of story breaks my heart. It's so senseless for a man to take his life rather than challenge a doctrine that he knows is false. It happens all too often. Doubly unfortunate that his church leaders and friends probably shook their heads in disappointment in him.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Switch to our mobile site