DADT Claims Another Victim

February 24, 2009

Two new victims of the US military’s “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” law have surfaced recently. I’ll have a post about Lieutenant Amy Brian tomorrow, but today let’s look at the case of 18-year-old Todd Belok.

"I have known I wanted to serve since early high school."

"I have known I wanted to serve since early high school."

Todd Belok, student at George Washington University and former member of the school’s Naval Reserve Officer Training Corps (NROTC) program, knew that DADT meant he’d have to be officially in the closet while he was at University, but he didn’t count on informants from a frat party where he kissed his boyfriend, who had come to visit GWU for the weekend. Senior Nick Trimis and Freshman Dave Perry decided that they’d rather not have homos in their unit and reported the kiss, ending Belok’s career in the NROTC.

Both Trimis and Perry commented to the school’s newspaper.

“I am not homophobic, I do not dislike gays,” Perry said. “It was just an uncomfortable situation for other midshipmen.”

“I was hoping he would just leave so he could go to OTS (Officer Training School) later,” Perry said. “I wish I had just let it go so Belok would not have gotten kicked out.”

Rough translation: “I’m okay with fags as long as they don’t act like fags. Fuckin’ fags with their fag germs.”

“It was drilled into me for a good 13 weeks that if someone does something wrong you are supposed to say something,” said Trimis, who enlisted in the Marines before coming to GW to finish his education. “There are certain rules in the military and when you tell, this is the way it plays out, but it is unfortunate.”

One wonders whether Mr. Trimis reported the underage drinking occurring at this frat party. Even though it may not have been hurting anybody, rules are rules, you know. And that’s without even getting to the hooking up that was no doubt occurring. Mr. Trimis is a Mormon, so one would assume that he took umbrage to the straight couples getting it on.

Interesting wrinkle in the case of Todd Belok: Though the US Navy and NROTC actively discriminate against gay men and women, George Washington University has a policy that clearly bars such discrimination.

The University’s policy, however, states any group using its trademarks will not “discriminate against any persons or groups based on age, ancestry, belief, color, creed, disability, national origin, race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, veteran status or other illegal basis, or in any other way that would be a violation of University antidiscrimination policies.”

University spokeswoman Tracy Schario said, although the policies clash, the University supports and has upheld the federal law.

“These are very, very sensitive, delicate issues,” Schario said. “Unfortunately the military can discriminate based on sexual orientation.”

Federal law says that any federal money a university receives, for anything from financial aid to research grants, can be withdrawn if the school does not comply with “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” or denies ROTC the right to recruit on campus.

Another translation from Matt: “The leadership at George Washington University, including Chairman of the Board W. Russell Ramsey and President Steven Knapp endorse discrimination as long as we get money for it.”

Pathetic.

Todd Belok, meanwhile, continues to hope for a career in the US Navy after DADT is overturned. Until then, he’s decided to work with the SLDN help the cause to repeal the US Government’s active discrimination.



  • http://www.stkeepinitreal.blogspot.com steve tabarez

    A great post Matt. A story that gets my juices flowing, my blood boiling, and my ire raised. Hadn’t seen this story posted anywhere else. Love a story that tells us the human impact of ridiculous policies meant to keep us subjugated.

  • http://www.stkeepinitreal.blogspot.com steve tabarez

    A great post Matt. A story that gets my juices flowing, my blood boiling, and my ire raised. Hadn’t seen this story posted anywhere else. Love a story that tells us the human impact of ridiculous policies meant to keep us subjugated.

    • http://blog.mattalgren.com Matt Algren

      The Washington Post just picked it up yesterday, but otherwise, it’s been pretty quiet. And make sure to come back for my next post for more human impact.

  • William Gates

    Could this be any more slanted? “… decided that they’d rather not have homos in their unit and reported the kiss” and “Rough translation: ‘I’m okay with fags as long as they don’t act like fags. Fuckin’ fags with their fag germs.’” Are you kidding me? It doesn’t matter whether service men and women agree or disagree with the policy, the fact is that it’s the law. There was no personal decision to repot this behavior. And when the Navy’s core values are honor, courage, and integrity, that means when you see someone acting inappropriately you take charge and act. This is not a matter of “snitching” or “tattling”. Being a naval officer means making some tough decisions; if it were easy, they’d call it your mom.

    -Bill

    • http://blog.mattalgren.com Matt Algren

      I doubt it could be more slanted, Bill. This is an opinion blog, not a straight (har!) news site.

      As for there being no decision from Mr. Trimis or Mr. Perry, I disagree. The US Navy has a zero tolerance policy on drug use and underage drinking. As I said in the body of the post, I seriously doubt that these two young men reported the underage drinking that was happening at that frat party. I doubt he’s reported the illegal drug use he’s seen at GWU. We both know that it’s there, but did he report it? Was anybody kicked out of the NROTC for it? And even if the underage drinker or the illegal drug user wasn’t in the NROTC, I’m certain that GWU has a policy against it as well, and I know the law in DC does.

      No, Mr. Trimis and Mr. Perry made a decision based on the fact that they didn’t want gay people around. Mr. Perry’s own words betray the real reason that this happened. “It was just an uncomfortable situation for other midshipmen.”

      The law should be changed, to be sure. But to paint members of the US Military as helpless pawns of an unjust law is disingenuous to say the least.

      • Pete

        You’re right. EVERYBODY DISOBEY THE LAW!!! I’m gonna start by lighting shit on fire!

        • http://blog.mattalgren.com Matt Algren

          “One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.”

          -Martin Luther King, Jr.

  • William Gates

    Could this be any more slanted? “… decided that they’d rather not have homos in their unit and reported the kiss” and “Rough translation: ‘I’m okay with fags as long as they don’t act like fags. Fuckin’ fags with their fag germs.’” Are you kidding me? It doesn’t matter whether service men and women agree or disagree with the policy, the fact is that it’s the law. There was no personal decision to repot this behavior. And when the Navy’s core values are honor, courage, and integrity, that means when you see someone acting inappropriately you take charge and act. This is not a matter of “snitching” or “tattling”. Being a naval officer means making some tough decisions; if it were easy, they’d call it your mom.

    -Bill

    • http://blog.mattalgren.com Matt Algren

      I doubt it could be more slanted, Bill. This is an opinion blog, not a straight (har!) news site.

      As for there being no decision from Mr. Trimis or Mr. Perry, I disagree. The US Navy has a zero tolerance policy on drug use and underage drinking. As I said in the body of the post, I seriously doubt that these two young men reported the underage drinking that was happening at that frat party. I doubt he’s reported the illegal drug use he’s seen at GWU. We both know that it’s there, but did he report it? Was anybody kicked out of the NROTC for it? And even if the underage drinker or the illegal drug user wasn’t in the NROTC, I’m certain that GWU has a policy against it as well, and I know the law in DC does.

      No, Mr. Trimis and Mr. Perry made a decision based on the fact that they didn’t want gay people around. Mr. Perry’s own words betray the real reason that this happened. “It was just an uncomfortable situation for other midshipmen.”

      The law should be changed, to be sure. But to paint members of the US Military as helpless pawns of an unjust law is disingenuous to say the least.

      • Pete

        You’re right. EVERYBODY DISOBEY THE LAW!!! I’m gonna start by lighting shit on fire!

        • http://blog.mattalgren.com Matt Algren

          “One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.”

          -Martin Luther King, Jr.

  • http://stkeepinitreal.blogspot.com steve tabarez

    Well, “Bill”, as far as honor and integrity are concerned, what honor is there in helping to keep us subjugated and uneaqual? And what kind of integrity does it take to live by a code that discriminates, and forces people to be hostages of the fear of being dismissed for being who we are? And, what kind of honor is it to be cowardly by not being man enough to approach Mr. Belok, and remind him of the policy? And, what kind of integrity does it take to pursue freedom and democracy abroad, when this policy reflects nothing of the kind? And, why, pray tell, should we be excluded from giving our life for this country on the basis of sexuality? Not that you know….

  • http://stkeepinitreal.blogspot.com steve tabarez

    Well, “Bill”, as far as honor and integrity are concerned, what honor is there in helping to keep us subjugated and uneaqual? And what kind of integrity does it take to live by a code that discriminates, and forces people to be hostages of the fear of being dismissed for being who we are? And, what kind of honor is it to be cowardly by not being man enough to approach Mr. Belok, and remind him of the policy? And, what kind of integrity does it take to pursue freedom and democracy abroad, when this policy reflects nothing of the kind? And, why, pray tell, should we be excluded from giving our life for this country on the basis of sexuality? Not that you know….

  • http://blog.mattalgren.com Matt Algren

    The Washington Post just picked it up yesterday, but otherwise, it's been pretty quiet. And make sure to come back for my next post for more human impact.

  • Pingback: Veterans Day: Thank You Naval ROTC Midshipman Todd Belok | Asterisk