FRC's Tony Perkins: US Should Side With Bush's 'Axis of Evil'

March 24, 2009

Sometimes I hate being right.

Last Thursday, I posted about the Obama Administration’s decision to sign a UN Declaration calling for the worldwide decriminalization of homosexuality. GWB had refused to sign the declaration in December 2008. In the post, I made a fairly inflammatory statement about the Religious Right.

The only difference between the Sharia in Iran and the Religious Right in the United States is degree of success.

I actually held the post up for a few hours last Thursday trying to decide whether I was going too far. At one point I took it out completely, then I put it back in with a disclaimer. I finally decided to post it because I honestly thought the statement was true. I still wasn’t sure, though.

That changed yesterday afternoon when I ran across this post from Americans United confirming what I had previously surmised.

“Only 66 of the U.N.’s 192 member countries signed the [French] statement,” [Family Research Council President Tony] Perkins observed, “while nearly as many (58) endorsed a counter-statement pointing out that rights based on ‘sexual orientation’ are not found in established international law. On the contrary, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights defends the family as ‘the natural and fundamental group unit of society.’ That – and not political correctness – is a principle worth defending.”

Let’s see. Who might be among the 58 countries “defending” the family and pushing for the “right” to execute, jail or otherwise penalize gay people?

Try those venerable members of George W. Bush’s “Axis of Evil,” Iran and North Korea. And don’t forget paragons of democratic virtue such as Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Libya, Algeria, Zimbabwe and the various ‘stans – Pakistan, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan.

Sudan took time out from waging genocide in Darfur to sign on too! And our erstwhile allies Iraq and Afghanistan were on the list as well.

Many of these countries scoff at individual freedoms, of course. Their definition of “family” includes polygamy in some cases and many keep women in brutal servitude. Religious minorities – including Christians, Tony – are persecuted relentlessly.

But what the heck, at least they’re keeping the gays in their place – pariahs, prison or the grave. Right, Tony?

Like I said, sometimes I hate being right.

The face of the "Axis of Evil" in America

The face of the "Axis of Evil" in America


By the way, the FRC is closely related to noted anti-gay organization Focus on the Family, having separated from Focus in 1992 over concerns about the IRS. Both organizations were founded by James Dobson, and Dobson sits on the Board of Directors still.

So next time you hear something from Dobson, Perkins, Focus on the Family, or the FRC, remember: When it comes to The Gays, they’ve thrown in with the Axis of Evil.



  • Lane Newton

    I know you feel very “right” and justified in your position and cause. However you and I both know you are not being honest or truthful when you state unabashedly that the 58 countries that did not sign the treaty did so because they were -” “defending” the family and pushing for the “right” to execute, jail or otherwise penalize gay poeple.” REALLY? Selective hearing will only get you so far. Eventually your “righteous” cause is seen by everyone in the light of the unrighteous lies that make up your premise (even those who agree with your cause see it – they are just willing to overlook it). Meanwhile your nobel cause for understanding and compassion is now lost in the maddening politics of “he said, she said”. To be sure, often the people who represent my point of view do this as well. The fact is Focus on the Family and I agree – we love gay poeple. I am certain you have heard them say that. It may be why you are so willing to misrepresent the truth in your position. Clearly you do not believe us. I hope love finds you.

  • http://blog.mattalgren.com Matt Algren

    Just to be clear, I didn't state those things, Joseph Conn of Americans United did. I do agree with him, though. What other reason is there for refusing to sign a non-binding statement that basically says “LGBTs have human rights.”?

    You're right, I don't believe the “we love gay people” claim when it's paired with “as long as they shut up and accept that they're going to burn in hell and/or stop being gay.”

    • Dakotahgeo

      Thank you, Matt!  Blessings!
      Dakotahgeo, M.Div.  Pastor/Chaplain

  • Lane Newton

    I know you feel very “right” and justified in your position and cause. However you and I both know you are not being honest or truthful when you state unabashedly that the 58 countries that did not sign the treaty did so because they were -” “defending” the family and pushing for the “right” to execute, jail or otherwise penalize gay poeple.” REALLY? Selective hearing will only get you so far. Eventually your “righteous” cause is seen by everyone in the light of the unrighteous lies that make up your premise (even those who agree with your cause see it – they are just willing to overlook it). Meanwhile your nobel cause for understanding and compassion is now lost in the maddening politics of “he said, she said”. To be sure, often the people who represent my point of view do this as well. The fact is Focus on the Family and I agree – we love gay poeple. I am certain you have heard them say that. It may be why you are so willing to misrepresent the truth in your position. Clearly you do not believe us. I hope love finds you.

  • http://blog.mattalgren.com Matt Algren

    Just to be clear, I didn't state those things, Joseph Conn of Americans United did. I do agree with him, though. What other reason is there for refusing to sign a non-binding statement that basically says “LGBTs have human rights.”?

    You're right, I don't believe the “we love gay people” claim when it's paired with “as long as they shut up and accept that they're going to burn in hell and/or stop being gay.”

  • Lane Newton

    I know you feel very “right” and justified in your position and cause. However you and I both know you are not being honest or truthful when you state unabashedly that the 58 countries that did not sign the treaty did so because they were -” “defending” the family and pushing for the “right” to execute, jail or otherwise penalize gay poeple.” REALLY? Selective hearing will only get you so far. Eventually your “righteous” cause is seen by everyone in the light of the unrighteous lies that make up your premise (even those who agree with your cause see it – they are just willing to overlook it). Meanwhile your nobel cause for understanding and compassion is now lost in the maddening politics of “he said, she said”. To be sure, often the people who represent my point of view do this as well. The fact is Focus on the Family and I agree – we love gay poeple. I am certain you have heard them say that. It may be why you are so willing to misrepresent the truth in your position. Clearly you do not believe us. I hope love finds you.

  • http://blog.mattalgren.com Matt Algren

    Just to be clear, I didn't state those things, Joseph Conn of Americans United did. I do agree with him, though. What other reason is there for refusing to sign a non-binding statement that basically says “LGBTs have human rights.”?

    You're right, I don't believe the “we love gay people” claim when it's paired with “as long as they shut up and accept that they're going to burn in hell and/or stop being gay.”

  • Pingback: James Dobson Spreads Lies with New Anti-Gay Website | Asterisk

  • Pingback: FRC’s Peter Sprigg: We should outlaw “gay behavior” | Asterisk

  • Pingback: Tim Tebow’s Deal with the Devil | Asterisk

  • Pingback: Eight Must-See Videos About The Prop 8 Decision | Asterisk

  • Altius Compare

    Find the best deals, reviews, price comparison services, online shopping website, ratings from different categories and different merchants products in “AltiusCompare.com”.

    http://www.altiuscompare.com/