President Obama Quietly Erases Commitment to LGBT Community

April 30, 2009

UPDATE HERE!!!

In all the flurry of news yesterday I didn’t get a chance to post my analysis of President Obama’s first 100 days in office. In general, I’m pleased with President Obama. He seems to be making decisions that I can generally stand behind, with a few glaring exceptions like vowing not to prosecute people who tortured prisoners on the government’s dime.

But when it comes to President Obama’s commitment to the LGBT community, there wasn’t much to talk about. After the Rick Warren debacle, we really needed to see some proof of the “fierce advocate for equality for gay and lesbian Americans” the President claims to be. And other than signing a UN resolution that has no legal ramifications (which I applaud) and using the word “homophobia” a couple times in laundry lists of prejudices there wasn’t a lot of substantive change coming from the White House. He even went in reverse as far as DADT is concerned, with White House spokespeople going from “Yes without a doubt we’re going to repeal it” to “That might not happen for a few years” to “If it happens at all…”

Then Tuesday night, President Obama released a statement right under the wire encouraging both houses of congress to pass this year’s version of the Matthew Shepard Act. It was a nice gesture. The President’s statement is presented below in its entirety.

This week, the House of Representatives is expected to consider H.R. 1913, the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009. I urge members on both sides of the aisle to act on this important civil rights issue by passing this legislation to protect all of our citizens from violent acts of intolerance – legislation that will enhance civil rights protections, while also protecting our freedom of speech and association. I also urge the Senate to work with my Administration to finalize this bill and to take swift action.

That’s it. That’s the entire statement. Three sentences. Eight-nine words. The night before the House was scheduled to vote, after even the Religious Right had already conceded that it would probably pass.

So on LGBT issues, I would have given President Obama a D yesterday. (I was in a generous mood.)

Then today, Joe.My.God made the stunning discovery. In the very recent past, someone in the Obama administration has made a major change to the White House’s official website. What had been a detailed list of commitments to the LGBT community has been reduced to two sentences.

President Obama also continues to support the Employment Non-Discrimination Act and believes that our anti-discrimination employment laws should be expanded to include sexual orientation and gender identity. He supports full civil unions and federal rights for LGBT couples and opposes a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage.

But don’t take my word for it. Here’s a screengrab of the page from Google’s cache, and here’s one of the new page. You’ll notice that several items are missing in the new text. Gone is any mention of repealing DADT. Adoption rights are conspicuously absent. AIDS prevention has disappeared altogether. Tuesday’s statement notwithstanding, there’s no commitment on the page about support for hate crimes legislation. There’s still clumsy language to get around supporting marriage equality.

As I see it, there are two possibilities here. Either some lower-level staffer made a bad decision or President Obama isn’t the “fierce advocate” that he’s claimed to be.

To tell you the truth, I’m inclined to believe the latter. We’re a fairly small percentage of the population, and unless the wheels are already in motion (as in hate crime legislation) and people are already behind the issue, what’s the political reason to stick his nose out for us? What could possibly be gained from standing up for Lesbian, Bisexual, Transsexual, and gay Americans?

Other than justice, I mean.

President Obama leaves us behind.

President Obama leaves us behind.


Mr. President, I’m disappointed that you’ve decided your LGBT constituents are expendable. I’m frustrated that it looks like you’ve stolen back the commitment you made before the vast majority of our community voted for you.

I hope I’m wrong on this, but assuming this wasn’t some clerical error or something, I don’t see any other way to figure it.

UPDATE HERE!!!



  • http://jessicasideways.com Jessica Sideways

    Oh my goddess, I wonder if a few months from now – those two sentences will be wiped off the whitehouse.gov website…

  • http://jessicasideways.com Jessica Sideways

    Oh my goddess, I wonder if a few months from now – those two sentences will be wiped off the whitehouse.gov website…

  • Phil Attey

    Interesting post. I disagree with it wholeheartedly, as would the leaders of every national LGBT organization save perhaps the Log Cabin Republicans.

    Ask Rea Carey of the Task Force, Joe Solmonese of HRC, Ken Wolf of the Victory Fund or Mara Kessling of the National Center for Transgender Equality what grade they’d give our President. All of them give our President high marks for his first 100 days and I value their opinions far more than yours. So should anyone who bothers to read your opinion.

    • http://blog.mattalgren.com Matt Algren

      If the leaders of the old guard lobbying groups have reason to find differently, I’d love to see it. LOVE. The President of the United States could be a major leader in the struggle for civil rights. So far, he’s chosen not to.

      Thank you for your comment.

    • Tina Kent

      Sorry Phil, but as a transsexual I tend not to believe anything that Say It Aint So Joe says. He’s already proven that his word means absolutely nothing, I have no reason to put any trust in his opinion now.

  • Phil Attey

    Interesting post. I disagree with it wholeheartedly, as would the leaders of every national LGBT organization save perhaps the Log Cabin Republicans.

    Ask Rea Carey of the Task Force, Joe Solmonese of HRC, Ken Wolf of the Victory Fund or Mara Kessling of the National Center for Transgender Equality what grade they’d give our President. All of them give our President high marks for his first 100 days and I value their opinions far more than yours. So should anyone who bothers to read your opinion.

    • http://blog.mattalgren.com Matt Algren

      If the leaders of the old guard lobbying groups have reason to find differently, I’d love to see it. LOVE. The President of the United States could be a major leader in the struggle for civil rights. So far, he’s chosen not to.

      Thank you for your comment.

    • Tina Kent

      Sorry Phil, but as a transsexual I tend not to believe anything that Say It Aint So Joe says. He’s already proven that his word means absolutely nothing, I have no reason to put any trust in his opinion now.

  • JR

    This doesn’t surprise me at all. That’s why I didn’t vote for him in the primary. People got swept up in the hype and the slogans and forgot that Barack Obama is a politician just like the rest. He may have been younger and fresher looking than his opponents, but he’ll look just as worn out and will have disappointed us many times by the end of his run in the White House. Don’t get me wrong, I’m happy he beat McCain. I’m just not surprised that all that talk about “change” was more of a feel good, catchy campaign slogan than a reality.

  • JR

    This doesn’t surprise me at all. That’s why I didn’t vote for him in the primary. People got swept up in the hype and the slogans and forgot that Barack Obama is a politician just like the rest. He may have been younger and fresher looking than his opponents, but he’ll look just as worn out and will have disappointed us many times by the end of his run in the White House. Don’t get me wrong, I’m happy he beat McCain. I’m just not surprised that all that talk about “change” was more of a feel good, catchy campaign slogan than a reality.

  • http://thomascwaters.com Thomas Waters

    I would agree that in the first 100 days there hasn’t been too much to be too happy with in terms of GLBTQ issues. I think the President is finding the lack of partisanship and the conservatives harder to cope with than he expected. I don’t feel used by him, or left behind. I think he is up to his eyeballs in shit between the economy, unemployment, healthcare, the wars.

    I don’t think we are doing too bad either. Marriage Equality is moving forward. Hate Crimes, and nondiscrimination legislations are moving forward.

    I don’t agree with JR- that “change” was just a catch phrase. I just think it is hard to be in the middle of change and see it easily. As more of the huge problems get under control, there will be more time for pushing for GLBTQ issues when we need the President.

  • http://thomascwaters.com Thomas Waters

    I would agree that in the first 100 days there hasn’t been too much to be too happy with in terms of GLBTQ issues. I think the President is finding the lack of partisanship and the conservatives harder to cope with than he expected. I don’t feel used by him, or left behind. I think he is up to his eyeballs in shit between the economy, unemployment, healthcare, the wars.

    I don’t think we are doing too bad either. Marriage Equality is moving forward. Hate Crimes, and nondiscrimination legislations are moving forward.

    I don’t agree with JR- that “change” was just a catch phrase. I just think it is hard to be in the middle of change and see it easily. As more of the huge problems get under control, there will be more time for pushing for GLBTQ issues when we need the President.

  • BillySF

    Groan! I wish I had not read this BUT glad you wrote it. Thanks. Groan.

  • BillySF

    Groan! I wish I had not read this BUT glad you wrote it. Thanks. Groan.

  • Kevin

    I don’t understand what the hullabaloo is all about. I KNEW Obama was not really an advocate for the GLBT which is why I did not vote for him. Obama had never made an out and out proclaimation that is supporting Gay Rights let alone any specific cause. If he said anything, it was a general statement.
    Recently I came to the sad realization that many of Democratic allies have always grandstanded on GLBT issues. If you look at the last 30 years, there really hasn’t been a supportive President in regard to GLBT community. You cannot count Clinton. Why? Because of 2 momentous bills he supported even with the Republican Congress: DADT and DOMA. Bush may have said, I’m against anything GLBT but he never signed any significant bills that were anti-gay or set us back. He never superseded the Supreme Court and had the Lawrence vs. Texas overturned.
    Obama is going to be another Clinton–mark my words. He seems like a nice guy and part of me wants to believe him but overall, I am not putting any stock into him at all. Just don’t get your hopes up.

  • Kevin

    I don’t understand what the hullabaloo is all about. I KNEW Obama was not really an advocate for the GLBT which is why I did not vote for him. Obama had never made an out and out proclaimation that is supporting Gay Rights let alone any specific cause. If he said anything, it was a general statement.
    Recently I came to the sad realization that many of Democratic allies have always grandstanded on GLBT issues. If you look at the last 30 years, there really hasn’t been a supportive President in regard to GLBT community. You cannot count Clinton. Why? Because of 2 momentous bills he supported even with the Republican Congress: DADT and DOMA. Bush may have said, I’m against anything GLBT but he never signed any significant bills that were anti-gay or set us back. He never superseded the Supreme Court and had the Lawrence vs. Texas overturned.
    Obama is going to be another Clinton–mark my words. He seems like a nice guy and part of me wants to believe him but overall, I am not putting any stock into him at all. Just don’t get your hopes up.

  • james black

    I’m a polygamist, and I don’t think he is going to do anything to help me and my wives. We, polygamists, are an even smaller minority than the gays, and yet no one cares about us.

    At least Obama has a gay half-sister in Africa.

    • Tina Kent

      One substantial difference between polygamy and LGBT is that polygamy is a lifestyle choice, as is swinging. People don’t choose to be LGBT, they are born that way.

  • james black

    I’m a polygamist, and I don’t think he is going to do anything to help me and my wives. We, polygamists, are an even smaller minority than the gays, and yet no one cares about us.

    At least Obama has a gay half-sister in Africa.

    • Tina Kent

      One substantial difference between polygamy and LGBT is that polygamy is a lifestyle choice, as is swinging. People don’t choose to be LGBT, they are born that way.

  • itjobs1

    Groan! I wish I had not read this BUT glad you wrote it. Thanks. Groan.

  • itjobs1

    Groan! I wish I had not read this BUT glad you wrote it. Thanks. Groan.
    http://www.staffingpower.com

  • Pingback: President Obama, Where Did Your Commitment Go? — The Gaytheists