<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Soldier Fired While Obama Sits on his Hands</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mattalgren.com/2009/05/another-soldier-fired-while-obama-sits-on-his-hands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mattalgren.com/2009/05/another-soldier-fired-while-obama-sits-on-his-hands/</link>
	<description>A gay Christian moving the forbidden from the footnotes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hung_chau_lee</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattalgren.com/2009/05/another-soldier-fired-while-obama-sits-on-his-hands/#comment-4582</link>
		<dc:creator>hung_chau_lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 08:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mattalgren.com/2009/05/another-soldier-fired-while-obama-sits-on-his-hands/#comment-4582</guid>
		<description>One of the primary questions is the UCMJ article about sodomy.  It seems homosexual sodomy is a no-no and heterosexual sodomy is OK.  Just look at the &quot;Captain amErika&quot; debacle about pictures posted by her former husband that got her an Article 15 (Non Judicial Punishment) but permitted her to remain in the military.  She is now a Lieutenant Colonel in the Air Force Reserve.  - or does that mean the Reserve has a different standard than the active force.  It&#039;s still a misapplication of the law and needs to change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the primary questions is the UCMJ article about sodomy.  It seems homosexual sodomy is a no-no and heterosexual sodomy is OK.  Just look at the &#8220;Captain amErika&#8221; debacle about pictures posted by her former husband that got her an Article 15 (Non Judicial Punishment) but permitted her to remain in the military.  She is now a Lieutenant Colonel in the Air Force Reserve.  &#8211; or does that mean the Reserve has a different standard than the active force.  It&#8217;s still a misapplication of the law and needs to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xyrus</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattalgren.com/2009/05/another-soldier-fired-while-obama-sits-on-his-hands/#comment-4575</link>
		<dc:creator>Xyrus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mattalgren.com/2009/05/another-soldier-fired-while-obama-sits-on-his-hands/#comment-4575</guid>
		<description>Paul,

I read your post, and while I support your opinions, I do not agree with them.  I don&#039;t know the details of this officer&#039;s discharge or investigation, but believe it or not, but you are serving with gay troops, and [probably] have been ever since you enlisted.  That means you&#039;ve showered with them, they&#039;ve seen you naked (and if you weren&#039;t hit on, you probably aren&#039;t real eye candy, so don&#039;t worry too much about it), they probably were in your leadership... face it... you&#039;ve served with gay military members.  Any problems at all???   I see your point on marriage, and that&#039;s why I support the Civil Union alternative.  Your writing makes the assumption that people &quot;choose&quot; to be gay.  When did you choose to be straight?  Furthermore, your post lends to the assumption that U.S. troops are not capable of dealing with diversity in the workplace.  So being that you are too weak to work with another service member because he/she is different that you shows that you probably need a new profession.    </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p>
<p>I read your post, and while I support your opinions, I do not agree with them.  I don&#8217;t know the details of this officer&#8217;s discharge or investigation, but believe it or not, but you are serving with gay troops, and [probably] have been ever since you enlisted.  That means you&#8217;ve showered with them, they&#8217;ve seen you naked (and if you weren&#8217;t hit on, you probably aren&#8217;t real eye candy, so don&#8217;t worry too much about it), they probably were in your leadership&#8230; face it&#8230; you&#8217;ve served with gay military members.  Any problems at all???   I see your point on marriage, and that&#8217;s why I support the Civil Union alternative.  Your writing makes the assumption that people &#8220;choose&#8221; to be gay.  When did you choose to be straight?  Furthermore, your post lends to the assumption that U.S. troops are not capable of dealing with diversity in the workplace.  So being that you are too weak to work with another service member because he/she is different that you shows that you probably need a new profession.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattalgren.com/2009/05/another-soldier-fired-while-obama-sits-on-his-hands/#comment-3804</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mattalgren.com/2009/05/another-soldier-fired-while-obama-sits-on-his-hands/#comment-3804</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt, thanks for responding. I read about this case as soon as it happened in the Stars and Stripes. I am a military member.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Matt, most moral people do not participate in websites where they can meet people and have sex with them the first time they meet. He had gay (abnormal) sex, which when admitted to, is against the rules and regulations of the military. It was the LT Col&#039;s lewd and lascivious lifestyle that caught up to him, to be honest. If he had not had sex with this person the first time they met at his home, then the person might have had second thoughts about him making a rape allegation against the Lt Col. My point was that most media outlets do not make mention of how he was &quot;outed&quot; but that he was &quot;outed&quot; by a third party (which is not a legitimate reason to cause a military investigation) and that this Lt Col is such a innocent hero and that he has nine Air Medals. No one makes note that he had a nude picture of himself on a gay website, which probably promoted more lewd and lascivious people to his page because they thought he was a lewd and lascivious person too, and that they wanted to have gay abnormal sex. No one makes mention that he trolls the gay web sites looking for other men to have sex with, YUCK. The USAF is bound by Congressional Law to discharge the &#039;gay pilot&#039;, as he is now known as, from the USAF. The President cannot direct an Executive Order that goes against a Constitutionally supported LAW. President Truman could write the E.O. in desegregating the Armed Forces because there was no Congressional Law stating that the Armed Forces will be segregated by racial background. So it&#039;s not directly up to our President. Congress has to repeal the Law, which I hope does  not happen because having openly LGBT folks serve in the military is against good order and discipline and will kill morale. The studies and surveys that support otherwise are not well founded. Matt, I assume you are a man and I have to ask you, would you want your wife who hypothetically serves in the military to take a shower with a man? Most moral people and those that love their spouse would say &#039;no&#039;, so you have to realize that when you put a homosexual in the shower with a heterosexual that is the situation you create. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please read the Congressional law  (10 U.S. Code Section 654) that prohibits homosexual (abnormal) behavior in the Armed Forces, Congress has exclusive control over the military according to the Constitution, Section 8 Article I. It is very well written and is very true. Once most people read it they see the light :) Thanks for your response and I hope you have a great day. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PS. I&#039;m also against the repeal of the DOMA law too. I love the definition of marriage is between one man and one woman!! Those words could never be truer. Who ever heard of a man marrying another man? Crazy and very abnormal. A man and a woman having sex are the only way a child can be conceived and please do not talk to me about test tube babies, artificial insemination, etc. Two men having ANAL sex cannot produce a baby, perhaps just a sore booty, YUCK! The same goes with two women having &#039;sex&#039; nothing can come from it but a sore tongue, hehehe. So as you can see I am a normal heterosexual and am not for any LGBT political agenda to legalize and same sex marriage BS. Thanks and take care! PAH.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt, thanks for responding. I read about this case as soon as it happened in the Stars and Stripes. I am a military member.</p>
<p>Matt, most moral people do not participate in websites where they can meet people and have sex with them the first time they meet. He had gay (abnormal) sex, which when admitted to, is against the rules and regulations of the military. It was the LT Col&#39;s lewd and lascivious lifestyle that caught up to him, to be honest. If he had not had sex with this person the first time they met at his home, then the person might have had second thoughts about him making a rape allegation against the Lt Col. My point was that most media outlets do not make mention of how he was &#8220;outed&#8221; but that he was &#8220;outed&#8221; by a third party (which is not a legitimate reason to cause a military investigation) and that this Lt Col is such a innocent hero and that he has nine Air Medals. No one makes note that he had a nude picture of himself on a gay website, which probably promoted more lewd and lascivious people to his page because they thought he was a lewd and lascivious person too, and that they wanted to have gay abnormal sex. No one makes mention that he trolls the gay web sites looking for other men to have sex with, YUCK. The USAF is bound by Congressional Law to discharge the &#39;gay pilot&#39;, as he is now known as, from the USAF. The President cannot direct an Executive Order that goes against a Constitutionally supported LAW. President Truman could write the E.O. in desegregating the Armed Forces because there was no Congressional Law stating that the Armed Forces will be segregated by racial background. So it&#39;s not directly up to our President. Congress has to repeal the Law, which I hope does  not happen because having openly LGBT folks serve in the military is against good order and discipline and will kill morale. The studies and surveys that support otherwise are not well founded. Matt, I assume you are a man and I have to ask you, would you want your wife who hypothetically serves in the military to take a shower with a man? Most moral people and those that love their spouse would say &#39;no&#39;, so you have to realize that when you put a homosexual in the shower with a heterosexual that is the situation you create. </p>
<p>Please read the Congressional law  (10 U.S. Code Section 654) that prohibits homosexual (abnormal) behavior in the Armed Forces, Congress has exclusive control over the military according to the Constitution, Section 8 Article I. It is very well written and is very true. Once most people read it they see the light :) Thanks for your response and I hope you have a great day. </p>
<p>PS. I&#39;m also against the repeal of the DOMA law too. I love the definition of marriage is between one man and one woman!! Those words could never be truer. Who ever heard of a man marrying another man? Crazy and very abnormal. A man and a woman having sex are the only way a child can be conceived and please do not talk to me about test tube babies, artificial insemination, etc. Two men having ANAL sex cannot produce a baby, perhaps just a sore booty, YUCK! The same goes with two women having &#39;sex&#39; nothing can come from it but a sore tongue, hehehe. So as you can see I am a normal heterosexual and am not for any LGBT political agenda to legalize and same sex marriage BS. Thanks and take care! PAH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattalgren.com/2009/05/another-soldier-fired-while-obama-sits-on-his-hands/#comment-3404</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mattalgren.com/2009/05/another-soldier-fired-while-obama-sits-on-his-hands/#comment-3404</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt, thanks for responding. I read about this case as soon as it happened in the Stars and Stripes. I am a military member.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Matt, most moral people do not participate in websites where they can meet people and have sex with them the first time they meet. He had gay (abnormal) sex, which when admitted to, is against the rules and regulations of the military. It was the LT Col&#039;s lewd and lascivious lifestyle that caught up to him, to be honest. If he had not had sex with this person the first time they met at his home, then the person might have had second thoughts about him making a rape allegation against the Lt Col. My point was that most media outlets do not make mention of how he was &quot;outed&quot; but that he was &quot;outed&quot; by a third party (which is not a legitimate reason to cause a military investigation) and that this Lt Col is such a innocent hero and that he has nine Air Medals. No one makes note that he had a nude picture of himself on a gay website, which probably promoted more lewd and lascivious people to his page because they thought he was a lewd and lascivious person too, and that they wanted to have gay abnormal sex. No one makes mention that he trolls the gay web sites looking for other men to have sex with, YUCK. The USAF is bound by Congressional Law to discharge the &#039;gay pilot&#039;, as he is now known as, from the USAF. The President cannot direct an Executive Order that goes against a Constitutionally supported LAW. President Truman could write the E.O. in desegregating the Armed Forces because there was no Congressional Law stating that the Armed Forces will be segregated by racial background. So it&#039;s not directly up to our President. Congress has to repeal the Law, which I hope does  not happen because having openly LGBT folks serve in the military is against good order and discipline and will kill morale. The studies and surveys that support otherwise are not well founded. Matt, I assume you are a man and I have to ask you, would you want your wife who hypothetically serves in the military to take a shower with a man? Most moral people and those that love their spouse would say &#039;no&#039;, so you have to realize that when you put a homosexual in the shower with a heterosexual that is the situation you create. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please read the Congressional law  (10 U.S. Code Section 654) that prohibits homosexual (abnormal) behavior in the Armed Forces, Congress has exclusive control over the military according to the Constitution, Section 8 Article I. It is very well written and is very true. Once most people read it they see the light :) Thanks for your response and I hope you have a great day. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PS. I&#039;m also against the repeal of the DOMA law too. I love the definition of marriage is between one man and one woman!! Those words could never be truer. Who ever heard of a man marrying another man? Crazy and very abnormal. A man and a woman having sex are the only way a child can be conceived and please do not talk to me about test tube babies, artificial insemination, etc. Two men having ANAL sex cannot produce a baby, perhaps just a sore booty, YUCK! The same goes with two women having &#039;sex&#039; nothing can come from it but a sore tongue, hehehe. So as you can see I am a normal heterosexual and am not for any LGBT political agenda to legalize and same sex marriage BS. Thanks and take care! PAH.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt, thanks for responding. I read about this case as soon as it happened in the Stars and Stripes. I am a military member.</p>
<p>Matt, most moral people do not participate in websites where they can meet people and have sex with them the first time they meet. He had gay (abnormal) sex, which when admitted to, is against the rules and regulations of the military. It was the LT Col&#39;s lewd and lascivious lifestyle that caught up to him, to be honest. If he had not had sex with this person the first time they met at his home, then the person might have had second thoughts about him making a rape allegation against the Lt Col. My point was that most media outlets do not make mention of how he was &#8220;outed&#8221; but that he was &#8220;outed&#8221; by a third party (which is not a legitimate reason to cause a military investigation) and that this Lt Col is such a innocent hero and that he has nine Air Medals. No one makes note that he had a nude picture of himself on a gay website, which probably promoted more lewd and lascivious people to his page because they thought he was a lewd and lascivious person too, and that they wanted to have gay abnormal sex. No one makes mention that he trolls the gay web sites looking for other men to have sex with, YUCK. The USAF is bound by Congressional Law to discharge the &#39;gay pilot&#39;, as he is now known as, from the USAF. The President cannot direct an Executive Order that goes against a Constitutionally supported LAW. President Truman could write the E.O. in desegregating the Armed Forces because there was no Congressional Law stating that the Armed Forces will be segregated by racial background. So it&#39;s not directly up to our President. Congress has to repeal the Law, which I hope does  not happen because having openly LGBT folks serve in the military is against good order and discipline and will kill morale. The studies and surveys that support otherwise are not well founded. Matt, I assume you are a man and I have to ask you, would you want your wife who hypothetically serves in the military to take a shower with a man? Most moral people and those that love their spouse would say &#39;no&#39;, so you have to realize that when you put a homosexual in the shower with a heterosexual that is the situation you create. </p>
<p>Please read the Congressional law  (10 U.S. Code Section 654) that prohibits homosexual (abnormal) behavior in the Armed Forces, Congress has exclusive control over the military according to the Constitution, Section 8 Article I. It is very well written and is very true. Once most people read it they see the light :) Thanks for your response and I hope you have a great day. </p>
<p>PS. I&#39;m also against the repeal of the DOMA law too. I love the definition of marriage is between one man and one woman!! Those words could never be truer. Who ever heard of a man marrying another man? Crazy and very abnormal. A man and a woman having sex are the only way a child can be conceived and please do not talk to me about test tube babies, artificial insemination, etc. Two men having ANAL sex cannot produce a baby, perhaps just a sore booty, YUCK! The same goes with two women having &#39;sex&#39; nothing can come from it but a sore tongue, hehehe. So as you can see I am a normal heterosexual and am not for any LGBT political agenda to legalize and same sex marriage BS. Thanks and take care! PAH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Algren</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattalgren.com/2009/05/another-soldier-fired-while-obama-sits-on-his-hands/#comment-3403</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Algren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mattalgren.com/2009/05/another-soldier-fired-while-obama-sits-on-his-hands/#comment-3403</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m assuming you didn&#039;t notice, but this post is from three months before the circumstances of Lt. Col. Fehrenbach&#039;s outing were made public. You can find my earlier reaction to the false claims of rape against him &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.mattalgren.com/2009/08/lt-col-victor-fehrenbach-outed-by-false-claims-of-rape/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fehrenbach isn&#039;t being booted because he used an internet dating site. He&#039;s being booted because he successfully defended himself against rape charges. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And if we&#039;re going to kick out every soldier who has sex, there are going to be a lot of empty Air Force bases.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for your comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m assuming you didn&#39;t notice, but this post is from three months before the circumstances of Lt. Col. Fehrenbach&#39;s outing were made public. You can find my earlier reaction to the false claims of rape against him <a href="http://blog.mattalgren.com/2009/08/lt-col-victor-fehrenbach-outed-by-false-claims-of-rape/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
<p>Fehrenbach isn&#39;t being booted because he used an internet dating site. He&#39;s being booted because he successfully defended himself against rape charges. </p>
<p>And if we&#39;re going to kick out every soldier who has sex, there are going to be a lot of empty Air Force bases.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul </title>
		<link>http://blog.mattalgren.com/2009/05/another-soldier-fired-while-obama-sits-on-his-hands/#comment-3402</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 05:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mattalgren.com/2009/05/another-soldier-fired-while-obama-sits-on-his-hands/#comment-3402</guid>
		<description>Funny, how this article doesn&#039;t talk about how the Gay LtCol patrols gay websites, meets men and invites them back to his house for lascivious and perverted gay sexual encounters. How many times a week does he do this? how many times a month? His naked body was on this perverted gay website. All of this is &#039;OK&#039; because the Lt Col has nine air medals right? The Air Force has an obligation to separate this gay pilot because Congress has passes the law to make the military expel openly gay homosexuals, the abnormal lifestyle, not the alternate lifestyle. Congress should not change the law; it should enforce the law. Yea!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, how this article doesn&#39;t talk about how the Gay LtCol patrols gay websites, meets men and invites them back to his house for lascivious and perverted gay sexual encounters. How many times a week does he do this? how many times a month? His naked body was on this perverted gay website. All of this is &#39;OK&#39; because the Lt Col has nine air medals right? The Air Force has an obligation to separate this gay pilot because Congress has passes the law to make the military expel openly gay homosexuals, the abnormal lifestyle, not the alternate lifestyle. Congress should not change the law; it should enforce the law. Yea!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

